ArticleJAMA pediatrics2025
Derivation and Validation of Predictive Models for Early Pediatric Sepsis.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric intensive care units: current applications in sepsis management.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Pooled it
- [Construction and validation of a multimodal risk prediction model for burn sepsis in infants and toddlers based on deep learning].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- Development of a machine-learning risk stratification tool for vasoactive medication need after two-bolus fluid resuscitation in pediatric suspected sepsis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Beyond recognition: advancing early prediction of pediatric sepsis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for pediatric health: Current trends and future opportunities.iScience · 2026Review
- An explainable machine learning model for early pediatric sepsis prediction using cytokine and routine laboratory data.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Article
- Integration of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Lactate for diagnostic and early risk stratification in pediatric sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Sepsis is a leading cause of death in children. Early recognition and treatment improve outcomes, but predictive models have not to date improved early diagnosis. Objective: To develop machine learning models to estimate the probability of developing sepsis in the subsequent 48 hours. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multisite registry for model derivation and validation using electronic health record (EHR) data from January 2016 through February 2020 and temporal validation from January 2021 through December 2022. The performance of machine learning algorithms was compared to predict development of sepsis and septic shock via logistic regression, specifically ridge regression and gradient tree boosting. Five health systems contributing to the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network were included. Emergency department (ED) visits for children aged 2 months or older to less than 18 years of age excluding patients with ED disposition of death or transfer, trauma diagnosis, or sepsis present during predictive features window. The TRIPOD-AI reporting guideline was followed, and data analysis was conducted from September 2023 to July 2025. Exposures: Patient and physiologic characteristics within the first 4 hours of ED care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sepsis, defined as suspected infection with a Phoenix Sepsis Criteria (PSC) score of 2 or more or death within 48 hours of ED arrival. Results: The dataset included 1 604 422 eligible visits in the training cohort and 719 298 visits in the test cohort. Performance characteristics for the PSC sepsis prediction models were AUROC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.92-0.93) for logistic regression and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.94) for gradient tree boosting. AUROCs for PSC shock models were 0.92 or greater. The gradient tree boosting models had positive likelihood ratios ranging from 4.67 (95% CI, 4.61-4.74) to 6.18 (95% CI, 6.08-6.28) for sepsis and from 4.16 (95% CI, 4.07-4.24) to 5.83 (95% CI, 5.67-5.99) for septic shock. Predictive features included emergency severity index, age-adjusted vital signs, and medical complexity. Assessment of model performance fairness was similar for all demographic characteristics except payor; AUROC for patients with Medicaid insurance was better than for those with commercial payers. Conclusions and Relevance: Using a large multicenter population, models were developed and validated with high AUROC to predict the future development of sepsis based on EHR data collected in the ED. The models achieved positive likelihood ratios to predict sepsis and septic shock. The results highlight the opportunity for future studies that combine EHR-based models with clinical judgment to improve prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.