Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082167›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025

Resolution of Near-Work-Related Effects, Accommodation, and Binocular Vision Changes of 0.05% Atropine After 1 Year: Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Study.

Wei Pan, Haoran Wu, Yao Tang, Yuanfang Yang, Qinglin Xu, Zhiwei Luo, Ziqi Hu, Wenyu Gao, Lijun Hou, Yuexiang Deng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dose-Dependent Effects of Atropine on Accommodative and Binocular Visual Function for Myopia Control in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wei PanAier Academy of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Haoran WuChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, 410015, China.
Yao TangAier Academy of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Yuanfang YangAier Academy of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Qinglin XuChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, 410015, China.
Zhiwei LuoChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, 410015, China.
Ziqi HuChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, 410015, China.
Wenyu GaoChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, 410015, China.
Lijun HouChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, 410015, China.
Yuexiang DengChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, 410015, China.
Zhikuan YangAier Academy of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoning LiChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, 410015, China. lixiaoning@aierchina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0678-557X

Funding

Clinic Research Foundation of Aier Eye Hospital Group AIM2301D06Hubei Key Research and Development Program 2020BCB013the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2022JJ40002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShort-term side effects often hinder the adoption of low-dose atropine in myopia management. Evidence from long-term observations and guidance on optimal dosing frequency is needed to inform clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate the effects of 0.05% atropine on near-work-related effects, accommodation, and binocular vision over 1 year of treatment.

methodsChinese children with myopia (aged from 6 to 14 years, cycloplegic spherical equivalent ≤ -1.00 D in both eyes) were enrolled between March 2021 and August 2023 at Changsha Aier Eye Hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to three regimen groups of 0.05% atropine: once daily (Qd), twice per week (Tw), and once per week (Qw) groups. Reported visual quality related side effects, the change of near work parameters, including visual acuity, reading distance, accommodation and binocular vision under the use of 0.05% atropine during 12 months were the main study outcomes.

resultsA total of 205 children were included in the study, 76 in Qd group, 70 in Tw group, and 59 in Qw group. Self-reported side-effects remained low in all groups, but showed frequency dependence. No cases of strabismus were reported or diagnosed. The most complaint side-effect was photophobia and blur at near (7.9% and 7.9%) at week 2 in Qd group, and both dropped to 3.9% at month 12. Pupil size under both photopic and mosopic, and viewing distance when reading consistently enlarged compared with baseline. All groups showed short-term changes in accommodation, and binocular vision, but gradually returned to baseline level by month 12. Mean (SE) of accommodation convergence to accommodation ratio (AC/A) in Qd group was 5.13(0.15), 5.82(0.16), 5.33(0.17), 5.22(0.17) Δ/D at baseline, week 2, month 6, and month 12, respectively; 5.09(0.16), 5.48(0.19), 5.42(0.19), 5.22(0.16) Δ/D in Tw group; and 4.90(0.19), 5.32(0.20), 5.17(0.19), 5.17(0.18) Δ/D in Qw group.

conclusionsLong-term use of 0.05% atropine appears to be safe in children with myopia. Although short-term visual function changes and side effects were associated with higher dosing frequency, these effects were largely transient and resolved over time.

Indexed as

0.05% AtropineAccommodationBinocular visionMyopiaNear Work

Identifiers

PMID41082167
PMCPMC12579076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.