ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2025
Digital Interventions for Stimulant Use Among People Living with HIV: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewStimulant use, which includes use of cocaine and methamphetamine, is known to worsen care outcomes among people living with HIV (PLWH). The rise of stimulant use in the United States (US) in the last decade is a threat to the US plan of Ending the HIV Epidemic. Digital interventions - including those delivered through web- and mobile phone-based modalities - may mitigate the scale of stimulant use among PLWH, thereby disrupting HIV transmission attributable to it. We sought to understand the state of digital interventions for stimulant use among populations of PLWH, with the goal of highlighting opportunities to expand such public health responses to stimulant use. RECENT
findingsOverall, digital interventions for stimulant use among PLWH appear feasible, clinically effective, and cost-effective. The state of these advancements has not been thoroughly examined or summarized to date. Since 2010, 17 publications have examined the feasibility, acceptability, and/or effectiveness of digital interventions for stimulant use among PLWH. The ubiquity of smartphones and opportunity to offer such interventions alongside HIV care services highlight the need for future research in this area, particularly those that target populations with suboptimal HIV care outcomes and who may benefit most from digital intervention modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.