Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082136›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2025

Big Data, Machine Learning, and Personalization in Health Systems: Ethical Issues and Emerging Trade-Offs.

Stefano Canali, Alessandro Falcetta, Massimo Pavan, Manuel Roveri, Viola Schiaffonati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefano CanaliDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. stefano.canali@polimi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5948-3874
Alessandro FalcettaDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Massimo PavanDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-5685
Manuel RoveriDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Viola SchiaffonatiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9127-6165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of big data and machine learning has been discussed in an expanding literature, detailing concerns on ethical issues and societal implications. In this paper we focus on big data and machine learning in the context of health systems and with the specific purpose of personalization. Whilst personalization is considered very promising in this context, by focusing on concrete uses of personalized models for glucose monitoring and anomaly detection we identify issues that emerge with personalized models and show that personalization is not necessarily nor always a positive development. We argue that there is a new problem of trade-offs between the expected benefits of personalization and new and exacerbated issues - results that have serious implications for strategies of mitigation and ethical concerns on big data and machine learning.

Indexed as

Big DataDelivery of Health CareMachine LearningPrecision MedicineHumansAI ethicsBig dataHealth systemsMachine learningPersonalization

Identifiers

PMID41082136
PMCPMC12518398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.