ArticleHealth care management science2025
Can past variants of SARS-CoV-2 predict the impact of future variants? Machine learning for early warning of US counties at risk.
Article in Health care management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we determine whether machine learning (ML) models created using data from the novel SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant can prospectively predict county-level incidence of emerging variants, validated using data of the Omicron variant. We first select publicly-available sociodemographic, economic, and health-related characteristics of 3140 United States (US) counties at the time of the confirmed early US outbreak of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus in March 2020 for analysis. Our primary result is the set of US counties that experienced the upper quartile of population-adjusted Omicron variant incidence at certain period (e.g., 100 days) after Omicron variant's appearance in the US. We show more predictive results by incorporating additional data and features (e.g., human mobility) that can be acquired dynamically after the outbreak, to improve prediction accuracy at the cost of additional waiting time and effort. Towards the goal of decision support, we aim to prospectively evaluate our models' ability to classify and rank US counties at risk. We measure their classification performance using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve score with 95% confidence intervals. We further calculate the proportion of the top counties by Omicron incidence that our models correctly identify, and compare their score with those of individual county-level features that can serve as a heuristic predictive performance baseline. Our results show that ML algorithms predict county-level Omicron variant incidence with better performance than natural heuristics that decision makers might otherwise use. More generally, historical data from the first wave of a novel pandemic can help predict the incidence of future variants and strengthen state or federal pandemic response interventions. HIGHLIGHTS: Data-driven predictive models that capture patterns from early viral variants can support policymaking related to emerging viral variants. County-level sociodemographic, health, and economic characteristics are predictive of early COVID-19 outcomes in the United States (US). Machine learning models trained on early US county-level COVID-19 outcomes are additionally predictive of county-level SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant outcomes. County-level machine learning models can be used as a critical policymaking tool given the inevitability of novel emerging viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.