ArticleHealth care management science2025
Causal networks guiding large language models: application to COVID-19.
Article in Health care management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the context of diagnosis of COVID-19, this paper shows how to convert a Causal Network to a Large Language Model (LLM). The Causal Network was converted to the language model using prompts and completions. Prompts were composed from the full-factorial combination of the text associated with statistically significant variables in the Causal Network. Completions were based on the evaluation of the probability of COVID-19 using the Causal Network. The accuracy of the Causal Network and LLM was tested using two databases. The first database was based on a survey of 822 patients, collecting 12 direct (parents on the Markov blanket of COVID-19 diagnosis node), 7 indirect (associated with COVID-19 but not direct cause) symptoms of COVID-19. The second set was based on 80 patients reporting their symptoms in open-ended questions, often reporting some of the direct predictors and rarely reporting any indirect predictors of COVID-19. The accuracy of Causal Network and Markov blanket was tested using Area under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC). When indirect information was available, the Causal Network model (AUROC = 0.91) was significantly more accurate than the LLM (AUROC = 0.88), even though LLM model was trained to duplicate predictions of the Causal Network. Where the indirect information was not available, both models had lower accuracy (AUROC of 0.75 and 0.76). The accuracy of LLM depends not only on patterns among direct predictors of the outcome but also data not reported to the LLM. Conversational LLMs need to go beyond information the patient supplies and proactively ask about missing, typically indirect, information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.