Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082104›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2026

Clinical utility impact of DNA-based cytology using droplet digital methylation-specific PCR in gastric cancer.

Hiroki Harada, Takafumi Soeno, Akira Ooki, Kanako Naito, Hiroyuki Minoura, Kota Okuno, Shohei Fujita, Mikiko Sakuraya, Tadashi Higuchi, Koshi Kumagai and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hiroki HaradaDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan. hharada@med.kitasato-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-1983-4692
Takafumi SoenoDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Akira OokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Kanako NaitoDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0375, Japan.
Hiroyuki MinouraDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Kota OkunoDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Shohei FujitaDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Mikiko SakurayaDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Tadashi HiguchiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Koshi KumagaiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Takeshi NaitohDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0375, Japan.
Yusuke KumamotoDepartment of General-Pediatric Hepato Biliary Pancreatic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0375, Japan.
Naoki HikiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Keishi YamashitaDivision of Advanced Surgical Oncology, Department of Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal dissemination is a major cause of poor prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). Although conventional peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) is used to detect micrometastatic peritoneal spread, its sensitivity is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of droplet digital methylation-specific PCR (ddMSP) targeting cancer-specific methylation for DNA-based detection of peritoneal dissemination.

methodsPeritoneal lavage fluid was prospectively collected from 400 samples in 357 GC patients, including 360 samples from 339 patients with chemotherapy-naïve tumors. DNA was extracted, bisulfite-converted, and analyzed by ddMSP targeting CDO1 and HOPX methylation. Diagnostic performance was assessed by ROC analysis, and associations with clinicopathological features and prognosis were evaluated using logistic and Cox regression models.

resultsCDO1 and HOPX methylation levels were significantly elevated in CY1 cases compared with CY0 (p < 0.0001). CDO1 methylation demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for CY1 (AUC: 0.93; sensitivity: 83.9%; specificity: 90.9%), while HOPX methylation showed slightly lower performance (AUC: 0.86). Multivariate analysis revealed that ddMSP CDO1-hi was independently associated with serosal invasion (pT4), and HOPX-hi with both pT4 and nodal metastasis. Furthermore, CDO1-hi status was an independent adverse prognostic factor for peritoneal dissemination-free survival (HR: 2.73, p = 0.018).

conclusionsddMSP-based detection of CDO1 methylation provides a sensitive and specific method for identifying micrometastatic peritoneal spread in GC. This DNA-based approach may serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker and contribute to improved perioperative management in gastric cancer.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationPeritoneal NeoplasmsPolymerase Chain ReactionStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCysteine DioxygenaseCytodiagnosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal LavageBiomarkers, TumorCDO1 protein, humanCysteine DioxygenaseHomeodomain ProteinsCDO1DNA methylationDroplet digital PCRGastric cancerHOPXPeritoneal dissemination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.