ReviewAdvances in therapy2025
Preservative-Free Gel-Formulated Glaucoma Therapies: Learning from the Past, Looking to the Future.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prostaglandin analog therapy challenges and innovation in glaucoma therapeutics.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSuccess of medical therapy in glaucoma relies on a delicate yet difficult balance between efficacy, tolerability, and adherence. Preservative-free (PF) formulations enhance tolerability and adherence and, by reversing glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease, improve long-term efficacy and the success of medical therapy, impacting millions of patients worldwide. By increasing contact time and reducing the concentration of active ingredients gel-formulated eyedrops the aim is to optimize antiglaucoma therapy.
methodsWe review evidence for a well-established PF gel-formulated option, timolol 0.1%, and discuss the emerging potential and value of two novel PF gel-formulated agents: bimatoprost 0.01% and the fixed combination (FC) of bimatoprost 0.01%/timolol 0.1%.
resultsCumulative evidence confirms PF gel-formulated timolol 0.1% once daily to be equivalent in efficacy to timolol 0.5% solution dosed twice daily, but safer. In a 3-month regulatory trial PF gel-formulated bimatoprost 0.01% demonstrated non-inferiority versus preserved bimatoprost 0.01% solution. More recently, a novel PF gel-formulated FC incorporated, for the first time, timolol 0.1% and bimatoprost 0.01%. By reducing the concentration of both active ingredients this FC aims to improve long-term tolerability and allow safer systemic delivery of timolol. Preliminary phase II controlled evidence demonstrated similar diurnal efficacy between the new FC and the popular bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% FC. We hypothesize that the wider adoption of PF gel-formulated agents will enhance glaucoma treatment options. Finally, we identify areas of unmet need that warrant further investigation.
conclusionsOverall, PF gel-formulated agents appear to be safer than and as effective as equivalent preserved antiglaucoma medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.