SynthesisCurrent diabetes reports2025
Statins and Type 1 Diabetes: Impact on Cardiovascular Outcomes and surrogates. Systematic Review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Current diabetes reports, 2025. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It also reports an association that does not count as treatment evidence, such as HR 0.77 (0.70 to 0.84) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
RECENT FINDINGS: Statin use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84; low certainty), and a mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction of 30.3 mg/dL (95% CI: -47.02 to -13.58; moderate certainty).
RECENT FINDINGS: Statin use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84; low certainty), and a mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction of 30.3 mg/dL (95% CI: -47.02 to -13.58; moderate certainty).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Statins×cardiovascular events
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →29 readable studies in this cell: 17 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Statins×lipids
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →38 readable studies in this cell: 25 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 8 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
purpose of reviewAtherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death in patients living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Dyslipidemia is a frequent risk factor in this population. Although statin therapy has demonstrated cardiovascular (CV) benefits in diabetes overall, specific evidence in T1D remains limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of statins on clinical and surrogate atherosclerosis-related outcomes in patients with T1D without established ASCVD. RECENT
findingsStatin use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84; low certainty), and a mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction of 30.3 mg/dL (95% CI: -47.02 to -13.58; moderate certainty). Reductions in ApoB and non-HDL cholesterol were also reported. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Epistemonikos from inception to June 2025 using terms related to T1D, statins, and primary prevention. Eleven studies were included-nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two cohort studies. Six (four RCTs and two cohorts) were eligible for meta-analysis of two primary outcomes; the remaining were summarized narratively. Statin use in T1D patients without ASCVD was associated with improved lipid profiles and reduced MACE. These findings support considering statins as a preventive strategy in this population, although prospective studies with hard outcomes are needed to better identify patients most likely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41082048What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.