Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082043›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2025

Literature as a Lens: Investigating Institutional Failures in Research Integrity through Fiction and Fact.

Christian J Wiedermann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christian J WiedermannInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Professions, Lorenz Böhler Street 13, 39100, Bolzano, BZ, Italy. christian.wiedermann@am-mg.claudiana.bz.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Boldt scandal, one of the largest documented cases of research misconduct globally, caused significant institutional failures in research oversight. These systemic issues at Justus Liebig University in Gießen, Germany played a critical role in enabling widespread data falsification and ethical violations. Benno von Bormann, a former collaborator of Joachim Boldt involved in the misconduct, subsequently authored the semi-fictional novel Das Hospital, which depicts hierarchical power dynamics and ethical dilemmas within a hospital setting. This book review examines how von Bormann's narrative parallels the documented institutional weaknesses that facilitated the Boldt scandal. By comparing insights from the University of Gießen's investigation report, as summarized in publicly available sources, and the themes in Das Hospital, a unique interdisciplinary analysis of institutional responsibility is offered. The twin-pronged approach sheds light on the systemic conditions that may encourage unethical research behaviours, potentially leading to corresponding patterns of research withdrawals in areas and disciplines where such practices are notably prevalent. This study concludes by revisiting approaches to enhance transparency, accountability, and cultural changes in research management. This underscores the importance of combining literary analysis with factual examination of institutions to tackle ongoing issues in upholding research integrity.

Indexed as

Boldt scandalInstitutional responsibilityInterdisciplinary analysisPublication ethicsResearch misconduct

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.