ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Prediction accuracy of femoral and tibial stress and strain using statistical shape and density model-based finite element models in paediatrics.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of Statistical Shape and Appearance Modelling for Predicting Osteoporotic Fracture Risk.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Understanding the influence of geometry and material properties on femoral and tibial stress and strain analysis in a paediatric population for single-leg standing simulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT)-based finite element (FE) models can non-invasively assess bone mechanical properties, but their clinical application in paediatrics is limited due to fewer datasets and models. Statistical Shape-Density Model (SSDM)-based FE models using statistically inferred shape and density have application to predict bone stress and strains; however, their accuracy in children remains unexplored. This study assessed the accuracy of stress-strain distributions estimated from SSDM-based FE models of paediatric femora and tibiae. CT-based FE models used geometry and densities derived from 330 CT scans from children aged 4-18 years. Paediatric SSDMs of the femur and tibia were used to predict bone geometries and densities from participants' demographics and linear bone measurements. Forces during single-leg standing were estimated and applied to each bone. Stress and strain distributions were compared between the SSDM-based FE models and CT-based FE models, which served as the gold standard. The average normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) for Von Mises stress was 6% for the femur and 8% for the tibia across all cases. Principal strains NRMSE ranged from 1.2% to 5.5%. High correlations between the SSDM-based and CT-based FE models were observed, with determination coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.96. These results illustrate the potential of SSDM-based FE models for paediatric application, such as personalized implant design and surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.