ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026
Laboratory detection methods for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in children: a review.
Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chlamydia trachomatis Pneumonia in a 50-Day-Old Full-Term Male Infant Associated With Mucus Plugging of the Left Upper Lobe Bronchus and Left Upper Lobe Atelectasis.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Prostatitis-Related Male Infertility: From Inflammation and Dysbiosis to Sperm DNA Damage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in children present distinct diagnostic challenges, ranging from perinatal conjunctivitis and pneumonia to trachoma and, in older children, sexually transmitted infections. This review systematically evaluates contemporary laboratory methods for detecting CT in children. The methods are categorized by their distinct targets, beginning with morphological identification via stains (e.g., Giemsa, immunofluorescence) with or without culture; followed by immunological detection of antigens or antibodies (e.g., ELISA); and finally, molecular analysis using NAATs for DNA or RT-PCR for RNA. Each technique is rigorously examined based on analytical sensitivity, specificity, turnaround time, and technical requirements, with particular emphasis on age-specific specimen selection, sampling logistics, and ethical-legal considerations-especially in cases of suspected abuse. Our analysis confirms that NAATs, particularly real-time PCR, are the first-line diagnostic choice for their superior sensitivity in detecting asymptomatic and low-bacterial-load infections in children. RNA-based detection is highlighted as the preferred method for treatment monitoring due to its ability to differentiate viable pathogens. In resource-limited settings, rapid antigen tests offer a practical screening solution, though require NAAT confirmation. The review also discusses emerging technologies, including isothermal amplification and biosensors, for point-of-care (POC) testing. By synthesizing current evidence with pediatric-specific guidelines from the CDC, WHO, and European health authorities, this review aims to establish an evidence-based framework to guide optimal test selection, improve early detection, and inform public health strategies to reduce the CT disease burden in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41081989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.