Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081978›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2026

Oncological outcomes after tailored PSMA-PET-guided treatment in biochemical relapse after prostatectomy (PSICHE Trial-NCT 05022914).

Giulio Francolini, Pietro Garlatti, Vanessa Di Cataldo, Saverio Caini, Mauro Loi, Gabriele Simontacchi, Isacco Desideri, Daniela Greto, Luca Burchini, Ilaria Bonaparte and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Giulio FrancoliniRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Pietro GarlattiRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy. pietro.garlatti@gmail.com.
Vanessa Di CataldoRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Saverio CainiCancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.
Mauro LoiRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Gabriele SimontacchiRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Isacco DesideriDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences ''Mario Serio'', University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Daniela GretoRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Luca BurchiniRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Ilaria BonaparteRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Giulio FrosiniRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Sergio SerniUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, nd Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo CampiUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, nd Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Luca VaggelliNuclear Medicine Division, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Niccolò BertiniRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Michele AquilanoCyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino Di Cura Ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Nicola SimoniRadiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Parma, Italy.
Federico ColomboRadiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Parma, Italy.
Ciro FranzeseRadiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.
Marta ScorsettiRadiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.
Arturo ChitiNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Livia RuffiniNuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maria Rosaria RaspolliniDepartment of Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Mack RoachUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Richard K ValicentiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Lorenzo LiviDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences ''Mario Serio'', University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation imaging (NGI) (68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET) represents a cornerstone in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer management. PSICHE is a multicentric prospective study, aimed to assess oncological outcomes of a predefined tailored imaging-guided treatment.

methodsPatients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after surgery (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > 0.2 ≤ 1 ng/mL) underwent staging with PSMA-PET. A predefined treatment algorithm was proposed to all patients: prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in case of negative or positive PET within the prostate bed, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) if pelvic nodal recurrences or oligometastatic disease were detected, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was proposed in widespread polymetastatic disease. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline features and the rate of positive PSMA-PET/CT.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled. One hundred and seven patients had a PSMA negative/positive in the prostate bed; pelvic nodal disease or oligometastatic metastatic disease was detected in 39 and 10 patients, respectively. Three patients had a polymetastatic disease. Seventeen patients underwent observation because of prior postoperative radiotherapy (RT)/treatment refusal. Eighty-eight patients were treated with SRT, and SBRT was performed in 49 patients with pelvic or extrapelvic oligometastatic disease. Stratifying patients according to EAU criteria (low risk: PSA doubling time > 12 months and Gleason score < 8; high risk: PSA doubling time ≤ 12 months or Gleason score ≥ 8) after a median follow-up of 19 months in the overall population, median BRFS and MFS were not significantly different between the two risk subgroups (p = 0.58 and p = 0.21, respectively). Median metastasis-free and ADT-free survival were not reached.

conclusionsA PSMA-targeted treatment strategy led to promising results, avoiding unnecessary toxicity from ADT or standard SRT administered in unselected patients. Analysis after longer follow-up is needed to clarify survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAntigens, SurfaceGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiosurgeryAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticalsProstate cancerPSMA-PETSBRT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.