SynthesisLasers in medical science2025
A systematic review of procedural modalities in the treatment of lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and discoid lupus erythematosus.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lichen planopilaris (LPP), frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are lymphocytic cicatricial alopecias causing irreversible follicular loss. Procedural therapies have been proposed to control inflammation, remodel scarred tissue, and, occasionally, promote hair regrowth. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus through July 28, 2025, selecting original studies of procedural interventions for LPP, FFA, and DLE. We assessed methodological quality using NIH and Murad et al. tools. Thirty-eight studies comprising 411 patients were included, reporting lasers/light therapies, platelet-derived products, adipose/exosome injections, low-level light therapy (LLLT), intralesional corticosteroids (ILCS), carboxytherapy, microneedling, and hair transplantation. Outcomes reported were both subjective (patient-reported symptom change, global physician assessment) and objective (LPPAI/FFASS activity scores, terminal hair counts, hair shaft diameter, and photographic density). Platelet products most consistently reduced activity scores and improved symptoms; several reports also documented increases in terminal hair counts or shaft diameter. LLLT led to improved patient-reported outcomes and modest, measurable gains in hair counts/thickness in small series. ILCS reliably achieved disease stabilization and reductions in activity scores but yielded inconsistent objective regrowth. Hair transplantation resulted in good early cosmetic density in quiescent patients, with several studies documenting quantitative density at 6-24 months but progressive graft loss by 3-5 years. Adipose and exosome injections showed promising case-level increases in density/thickness, although the results remained preliminary. Adverse events were generally mild and procedure-specific. In hair transplantation, long-term graft durability remains a major concern. Procedural modalities may serve as useful treatments for symptom control and limited regrowth in selected patients with scarring alopecia. These modalities are best considered adjuncts to medical therapy pending standardized, controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41081974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.