ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2025
Evaluation of a self-gripping slowly resorbable mesh for ventral hernia repair: in vitro degradation and in vivo biocompatibility in a rabbit model.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates a new self-gripping, slowly resorbable mesh (SRM) for ventral hernia repair, focusing on its in vitro degradation and in vivo biocompatibility in a rabbit model. Traditional ventral hernia repair methods often use permanent synthetic meshes, which can have limitations. Slowly resorbable synthetic meshes, such as the SRM, offer a promising alternative by providing temporary support and gradually degrading to be replaced by the body's own tissue. The SRM, made from a poly(L-lactide) and trimethylene carbonate copolymer, was tested for its mechanical properties and degradation behavior. In vitro degradation was assessed according to ISO 13781:2017, while in vivo biocompatibility was evaluated following ISO 10993-6 guidelines. The study included native and pre-degraded samples implanted in New Zealand White rabbits, with assessments at 4, 10-, 26-, 52-, and 78-week post-implantation. Results showed that the SRM provided mechanical support for at least 20 weeks, with favorable integration and biocompatibility. The in vitro degradation profile indicated a steady decline in molecular weight, while in vivo studies revealed controlled degradation and minimal inflammatory response. Comparative analysis with the commercially available TIGr® Matrix Surgical Mesh demonstrated that the SRM had similar or better performance in terms of tissue response and degradation. The preclinical results of SRM, combined with the findings from this ISO 10993 Part 6 standard study, provide important data for market approval filings and the initiation of clinical evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.