Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081963›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Evidence-based recommendations for adult high-grade glioma therapy: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines.

Ziwei Jiang, Yanan Xu, Hongting Nie, Boya Xu, Nan Ji, Zhigang Zhao, Wei Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ziwei Jiang *Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, China.
Yanan Xu *Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Hongting NieDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China.
Boya XuBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Nan JiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Zhigang ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, China. jstzhangwei@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the quality of domestic and international clinical practice guidelines for adult high-grade glioma, provide evidence-based recommendations for treatment, and contribute to the development of clinical guidelines. A systematic search was conducted to identify Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) related to adult high-grade glioma published between January 1, 2016, and February 5, 2025. The quality of the guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Key recommendations from these guidelines were summarized and analyzed for comparative insights. A total of 19 guidelines from various countries and regions were included. Two guidelines from the US were identified as high quality. Most guidelines demonstrated strong clarity, editorial independence, and well-defined scope and purpose but scored lower in stakeholder involvement, methodological rigor, and applicability. Treatment recommendations for primary high-grade gliomas were largely consistent, emphasizing maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, variations existed in the prioritization of chemotherapy regimens and the application of tumor-treating fields. In contrast, recommendations for recurrent gliomas showed greater variability, with some guidelines favoring novel targeted therapies while others preferred conventional treatments, such as repeat surgery or re-irradiation. While there is broad consensus on the treatment of primary adult high-grade gliomas, recurrent glioma management varies due to limited research and lack of proven survival benefits. There is a critical need for more rigorous, inclusive, and regularly updated guidelines to improve clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEvidence-Based MedicineGliomaPractice Guidelines as TopicAdultHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAGREE IIClinical practiceGuidelinesHigh-grade glioma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.