ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Evidence-based recommendations for adult high-grade glioma therapy: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the quality of domestic and international clinical practice guidelines for adult high-grade glioma, provide evidence-based recommendations for treatment, and contribute to the development of clinical guidelines. A systematic search was conducted to identify Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) related to adult high-grade glioma published between January 1, 2016, and February 5, 2025. The quality of the guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Key recommendations from these guidelines were summarized and analyzed for comparative insights. A total of 19 guidelines from various countries and regions were included. Two guidelines from the US were identified as high quality. Most guidelines demonstrated strong clarity, editorial independence, and well-defined scope and purpose but scored lower in stakeholder involvement, methodological rigor, and applicability. Treatment recommendations for primary high-grade gliomas were largely consistent, emphasizing maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, variations existed in the prioritization of chemotherapy regimens and the application of tumor-treating fields. In contrast, recommendations for recurrent gliomas showed greater variability, with some guidelines favoring novel targeted therapies while others preferred conventional treatments, such as repeat surgery or re-irradiation. While there is broad consensus on the treatment of primary adult high-grade gliomas, recurrent glioma management varies due to limited research and lack of proven survival benefits. There is a critical need for more rigorous, inclusive, and regularly updated guidelines to improve clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41081963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.