ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Transorbital management of selected spheno-orbital meningiomas: Insights from a multicentric retrospective Italian study of 52 cases.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- State of the art and future perspectives on the management of spheno-orbital meningiomas: a meta-analysis comparing transorbital and transcranial approaches.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary treatment strategy optimization and long-term prognosis in spheno-orbital meningiomas: a multicenter retrospective study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Outcomes of orbital-cavernous sinus schwannomas via pterional approach combined with orbital osteotomy: a retrospective study of 32 cases.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach for spheno-orbital tumor: First reported case in Brazil.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs) are a rare type of intracranial tumor. Their location and behavior often make radical resection unfeasible. Recently, less invasive techniques have gained traction. The endoscopic transorbital approach (TOA), sometimes combined with lateral orbital rim removal or additional routes, offers a flexible surgical corridor for selected SOMs. This study evaluates the outcomes of TOA in SOM patients across five Italian tertiary centers, focusing on feasibility, safety, symptom relief, and tumor control. A retrospective multicenter study was conducted from January 2012 to December 2022, involving 52 patients treated with TOA. Data on symptoms, functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Proptosis was the most common symptom (94.2%), followed by diplopia (36.5%), visual impairment (34.6%), and blindness (3.8%). Orbital extension occurred in 28.8% of cases, cavernous sinus invasion in 21.2%, and infratemporal/pterygopalatine fossa involvement in 21.2%. Thirty-six patients underwent standard TOA, while 16 required multiportal or staged approaches. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 28.8%, subtotal in 23.1%, and partial in 48.1%. Trigeminal hypoesthesia (9.6%) was the most common complication. Proptosis resolved in 50 patients; however, two developed contralateral proptosis. Visual improvement occurred in 31% of cases. TOA appears feasible and safe for selected SOMs, especially for addressing proptosis. However, extensive tumor spread, large size, or vascular invasion are linked to lower GTR rates. Ideal candidates and formal guidelines are yet to be defined, but TOA represents a promising minimally invasive strategy in appropriate cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41081961What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.