ArticleHuman genetics2025
Evolution of the Japanese Y chromosome by analysis of the haplogroups and the deletion of the gene in the AZFc region.
Article in Human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Y chromosome is classified into haplogroups based on its nucleotide polymorphisms. There are multiple amplicon genes in the azoospermia factor c (AZFc) region of the Y chromosome, and combinations of copy numbers of these genes diversify the Y chromosome structure. In this study, we investigated the evolution of the Y chromosome in a Japanese population based on the relationship between the Y chromosome haplogroup and the deletion patterns of genes in the AZFc region. Haplogroup branch markers were determined by PCR, PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP), Sanger sequencing, and TaqMan PCR in 2,157 Japanese men. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) on DAZ, BPY2, CDY1, TTTY4, and GOLGA2P2Y gene copies were analyzed for deletions by PCR–RFLP. Haplogroups D1a2a1a, D1a2a1c, and D1a2a2 showed the same AZFc deletion patterns. Haplogroups C and O1b2a showed a common AZFc deletion, with some exceptions. Therefore, it is possible that they diverged into subgroups following the occurrence of a common AZFc deletion pattern. Haplogroups O2a2 and O2a1b showed a common AZFc deletion pattern with some exceptions; however, after dividing into their respective downstream haplogroups, they showed several more deletion patterns. Thus, several additional deletion patterns may have occurred because of the divergence of downstream haplogroups. Haplogroups O1a and O1b1a1a exhibited several AZFc deletion patterns. Thus, each haplogroup may have originated from a different ancestor. This study provides further insights into the relationship between Y chromosome haplogroups and the deletion patterns of genes in the AZFc region, which is important for understanding the evolution of the Y chromosome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41081937What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.