ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Patency of the lenticulostriate and Pontine arteries after stenting of the intracranial arteries.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parent Artery Disease-Related Stroke: What Is the Impact on Endovascular Treatment? A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interventional neuroradiology methods have a well-established role in the treatment of many cerebrovascular diseases, including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, with perforating artery strokes being a complication that limits recovery after intracranial artery stenting. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of covering the perforating artery origins with stent struts on their patency.Two geometric models of coverage of the perforating artery ostia by stent struts were developed, and calculations were made using data on origin dimensions from a collection of 3D models of twenty-three middle cerebral arteries and ten basilar arteries obtained by scanning a collection of anatomical specimens via microcomputed tomography.Analysis of 323 perforating artery geometries revealed that flow-diverting stents reduced the area of perforator origin from a few to 20-30%, whereas in the case of conventional stents, at least one third of the origin in every second perforator studied was covered. Smaller perforating arteries may be completely closed by the stent struts. In the case of implantation of two stents using telescopic technique, the coverage percentages were approximately 2 times higher.Stenting may significantly reduce the effective cross-sectional area of the perforating artery origin. The influence depends on the type of stent: flow diverting stents exert a mesh-effect, and the effect of classic stents is related to strut width. The effect is exacerbated by the implantation of two stents. Considering the supply areas of the pontine and lenticulostriate arteries, even small perforating artery infarction may lead to devastating neurological complications. To increase the safety of intracranial artery stenting, it is reasonable to design and use stents with the narrowest possible struts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.