ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2025
Adjuvant immunotherapy fails to improve survival in ypStage I esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsWhile adjuvant immunotherapy (AIT) is recommended for non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) patients, its role in ypStage I esophageal cancer (EC) patients with low tumor burden remains unclear. The study aims to evaluate the necessity of AIT for esophageal cancer patients achieving ypStage I following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) and surgery.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 157 ypStage I (ypT0-2N0M0) EC patients treated with NICT followed by surgery in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between 2019 and 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for baseline imbalances between the none adjuvant therapy (NAT, n = 121) group and AIT (n = 36) group. Survival outcomes analyses and Cox regression analyses were performed.
resultsIn the unmatched cohorts, 3-year overall survival (3-y OS) was 93.53% (NAT) versus 87.68% (AIT) (p = 0.76), and 3-year disease-free survival (3-y DFS) was 86.38% versus 84.17% (p = 0.60). Post-PSM (OS: 91.95% vs. 87.68%, p = 0.81 and DFS: 88.58% vs. 84.17%, p = 0.45) and IPTW-adjusted analyses (OS: 93.74% vs. 87.76%, p = 0.76 and DFS: 87.96% vs. 79.08%, p = 0.60) confirmed no survival advantage for AIT. Cox regression revealed no significant prognostic value of AIT for OS (unmatched cohorts: HR = 1.29, p = 0.757; PSM: HR = 1.270, p = 0.810; and IPTW: HR = 1.760, p = 0.536) or DFS (unmatched cohorts: HR = 1.320, p = 0.597; PSM: HR = 1.720, p = 0.459; and IPTW: HR = 2.230, p = 0.207).
conclusionsPatients with ypStage I EC following NICT and surgery might not benefit from AIT. This study provides a hint for the risk-benefit balance of prolonged immunotherapy exposure in ypStage I patients while preserving clinical efficacy. Further studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.