ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Treatment outcomes of switching to aflibercept 8 mg in previously-treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Six-month outcomes with a reduced two-injection induction (2+TAE) regimen of aflibercept 8 mg in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Switching to Aflibercept 8 mg in Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Early Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept 8 mg in Eyes Previously Treated with Aflibercept 2 mg for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with AI-Based Biomarker Quantification.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate outcomes of switching to aflibercept 8 mg in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study examined 6-month treatment outcomes in eyes with nAMD previously treated and switched to aflibercept 8 mg. Data including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of previous injections, and treatment intervals were collected. Central retinal thickness (CRT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and maximal pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height were measured on optical coherence tomography images.
resultsAnalysis included 121 eyes (117 patients). Median number of previous anti-VEGF injections was 31.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 20.5–55.5); median pre-switch interval was 5.0 (IQR: 4.0–8.0) weeks. At 6 months, 71 eyes (59%) continued aflibercept 8 mg and 50 (41%) discontinued due to worsening at intervals ≥ 8 weeks. The discontinued group had significantly shorter pre-switch intervals (4.0 [IQR: 4.0–5.0] vs. 6.0 [IQR: 5.0–8.0], P < 0.01) and thinner SFCT compared to the continued group (153 [IQR: 100–209] vs. 189 [IQR: 141–284], P = 0.012). At 6 months, CRT and PED decreased from 258 (IQR: 203–329) to 239 (IQR: 198–304) µm (P = 0.015) and from 195 (IQR: 112–293) to 164 (IQR: 82–263) µm (P = 0.007). BCVA was maintained (0.15 [IQR: 0.00–0.30] to 0.10 [IQR: 0.00–0.30]), P = 0.426). The median increase in injection interval was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0–3.5) weeks in continued eyes.
conclusionSwitching to aflibercept 8 mg may be an option to extend injection intervals, leading to a reduction in treatment burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41081891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.