Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081880›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Development and validation of a nomogram combining PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical indicators for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL.

Zhilian Su, Bufeng Cai, Luyao Li, Zhaohai Huang, Yuchuan Fu

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhilian SuThe People's Hospital of Pingyang, Wenzhou, China. suzhilian82@163.com.
Bufeng CaiThe People's Hospital of Pingyang, Wenzhou, China. 286658689@qq.com.
Luyao LiThe People's Hospital of Pingyang, Wenzhou, China.
Zhaohai HuangThe People's Hospital of Pingyang, Wenzhou, China. huangzhaoh0329@163.com.
Yuchuan FuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

The Pingyang Science and Technology program Y2024A01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis investigation focused on developing a predictive clinical tool that combines biparametric MRI-derived PI-RADS v2.1 assessments with patient-specific biomarkers. The model was designed to optimize prostate cancer detection reliability in individuals exhibiting prostate-specific antigen concentrations below 20 ng/mL, particularly targeting the diagnostic challenges presented by this intermediate PSA range. By systematically integrating imaging characteristics with laboratory parameters, the research sought to establish a practical decision-making framework for clinicians managing suspected prostate malignancies.

methodsA total of 218 patients with confirmed pathological diagnoses between January 2020 and December 2023 underwent a retrospective review. The cohort was divided into two distinct groups: a training cohort comprising 153 cases and a validation cohort containing 65 cases. For nomogram predictor selection, statistical modeling incorporated machine learning approaches including LASSO regression with ten-fold cross-validation, supplemented by both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent prognostic factors.The nomogram's predictive performance was evaluated by determining the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), developing calibration plots, and implementing decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsThe study findings revealed that among patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations ≤ 20 ng/mL, four parameters - PI-RADS v2.1 classification, free PSA ratio (%fPSA), diffusion-weighted imaging-derived ADC values, and serum hemoglobin concentrations - emerged as independent predictive factors for prostate carcinoma detection. The composite predictive model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to individual parameters, achieving an elevated receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.922. Notably, the PI-RADS v2.1 scoring system alone showed an AUC of 0.848 (P < 0.05) in this patient cohort. The area under the curve (AUC) for free PSA percentage reached 0.760 (P < 0.001), while apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values showed superior discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.825 (P < 0.001). Hemoglobin levels exhibited moderate predictive value (AUC = 0.622, P = 0.006). The developed predictive model exhibited outstanding diagnostic accuracy, achieving AUC scores of 0.922 in the training dataset and 0.898 in the validation cohort, complemented by precise calibration metrics. Integrating PI-RADS v2.1 scores with clinical parameters enhanced diagnostic performance, yielding 81.2% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity in lesion characterization.This marked improvement becomes evident when compared to the standalone application of PI-RADS v2.1, which yielded sensitivity and specificity values of 73.2% and 86.8% correspondingly.

conclusionThe PI-RADS v2.1 assessment derived from biparametric MRI demonstrates standalone prognostic value for detecting prostate malignancies in patients with serum PSA concentrations below 20 ng/mL. This imaging-based scoring system, when integrated with additional clinical parameters, significantly enhances the diagnostic reliability of clinical assessments. The methodology provides clinicians with a non-invasive evaluation tool featuring intuitive visualization capabilities, potentially reducing the necessity for invasive biopsy procedures while maintaining diagnostic precision. This integrated methodology demonstrates considerable promise as an effective framework for improving diagnostic accuracy in PCa identification and supporting therapeutic choices in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNomogramsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenNomogramProstate cancerProstate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS)Prostate specific antigen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.