Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081846›Full record

Observational studyEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Patient-centered care in cervical spine surgery - the impact of perceived patient involvement on patient-reported outcomes measures: a Swedish multicenter study.

Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Marcus Roland Victor Gustafsson, Patrick Vigren, Daniel de Wilde, Victor E Staartjes, Erik Edström, Adrian Elmi-Terander

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victor Gabriel El-HajjDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus Roland Victor GustafssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrick VigrenÖrebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Daniel de WildeMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Victor E StaartjesDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik EdströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Adrian Elmi-TeranderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. adrian.elmi.terander@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient involvement and shared decision-making (SDM) are central to patient-centered care and have been linked to improved patient satisfaction and outcomes. However, their implementation in spinal surgery remains limited, and the effect of patient involvement on postoperative outcomes is not well described.

methodsThis observational cohort study used data from the Swedish Spine Registry (Swespine) to examine the association between perceived patient involvement in decision-making and postoperative outcomes among adults undergoing cervical spinal surgery between 2006 and 2020. Propensity score-matching was performed at a ratio of 2:1 to minimize baseline differences between groups. Uni- and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with patient's perception of involvement in decision-making.

resultsA total of 3,249 patients were included, with 81% (n = 2,640) reporting perceived involvement in decision-making and 19% (n = 609) not. Following matching, patients who were involved in decision-making had significantly greater improvements at one year follow-up regarding neck and arm pain (p < 0.001), disability (p < 0.001), health-related quality of life (p < 0.001), and subjective satisfaction (p < 0.001). Patients with poorer preoperative health status are more likely to feel involved in decision making, while those undergoing minor procedures feel significantly less involved. Positive predictors of perceived patient involvement included number of operated levels (OR 1.13, p = 0.041), unemployment (OR 1.89, p < 0.001), walking less than 100 m at a normal pace (OR 1.45, p = 0.044), and higher preoperative NDI (OR 1.01, p = 0.039). Negative predictors included higher preoperative EQ-5D index (OR 0.64, p = 0.022) and higher preoperative myelopathy score (OR 0.96, p = 0.042).

conclusionPatients with a higher degree of perceived involvement report better postoperative patient-reported outcomes following cervical spinal surgery. Patients undergoing larger surgeries and with poorer preoperative health status were more likely to perceive involvement than those undergoing minor procedures. Identifying and supporting patients that are susceptible to feel less involved in treatment-related decisions through individualized information or counseling may help optimize outcomes and satisfaction.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraePatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedCohort StudiesDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeRegistriesSwedenspine surgery; patient involvement; shared decision-making; informed consent; registry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.