ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
Indoor Air Pollutants of PM2.5, Carbon Monoxide, Nicotine, and Carcinogens in Waterpipe Bars.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWaterpipe smoking has become popular in East Asia and other regions. However, few studies have investigated the indoor air quality, including the presence of carcinogens, in waterpipe bars (WBs). This study aimed to compare indoor air quality between WBs and non-WBs in Hong Kong, focusing on differences observed during weekdays and weekends.
methodsAir samples from 8 WBs and 6 non-WBs were collected to investigate levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), nicotine, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the ambient air of these bars. Samples were collected for 2 h in each bar during both a weekday and a weekend evening. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsThe median PM2.5 levels in WBs was 332.1 μg/m3 on weekdays and 1001 μg/m3 on weekends. Similarly, CO levels in WBs were 22.5 ppm on weekdays 27.9 ppm on weekends. The comparison showed that PM2.5 (p = .0019) and CO (p = .0019) levels in WBs were significantly higher than those in non-WBs on weekdays. Airborne nicotine levels were 3.2 μg/m3 on weekdays and 16.1 μg/m3 on weekends. Most VOCs and PAHs levels were higher during weekends, with benzo[a]pyrene at 15.3 ng/m3 (weekday) and 22.5 ng/m3 (weekend), and Formaldehyde at 57 μg/m3 (weekday) and 66.5 μg/m3 (weekend)-Group 1 carcinogens.
conclusionThis study revealed alarmingly high levels of airborne PM2.5, CO, nicotine, and carcinogens such as Benzo[a]pyrene and Formaldehyde in WBs in Hong Kong, especially on weekends. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides the first evidence of air quality in waterpipe establishments in Asia, demonstrating extremely poor air quality that pose significant health risks to both patrons and staff. These results can serve as evidence for the strict enforcement of tobacco control policies, such as total waterpipe bans. It is also crucial to assess compliance with occupational safety regulations in WBs and to ensure employees exposed to high levels of harmful substances such as PM2.5, CO, nicotine, and carcinogens are offered education and health screenings and education. These measures are vital to ensuring the safety and health of workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.