ArticleThe oncologist2025
Real-world effectiveness of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome containing regimens in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updates of CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute leukemia: 2026 edition.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Liposomal mitoxantrone, venetoclax and azacitidine in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia and early induction failure: a single-centre real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome (Lipo-MIT) exhibits encouraging efficacy in treating multiple hematologic malignancies. This study evaluated the real-world efficacy and safety of Lipo-MIT-containing regimens in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
methodsThis noninterventional, ambispective cohort study was conducted at 42 centers in China. Patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory AML who received Lipo-MIT-containing regimens were included. The primary endpoint was the composite complete remission (CRc) rate.
resultsBetween January 2022 and December 2023, 117 patients with newly diagnosed AML and 122 patients with relapsed/refractory AML were included. The CRc and objective response rates were 84.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.8-90.6) and 91.5% (95% CI, 84.8-95.8), respectively, in the newly diagnosed AML, and 45.1% (95% CI, 36.1-54.3) and 55.7% (95% CI, 46.5-64.7), respectively, in relapsed/refractory AML. The 2-year-event-free survival and overall survival rates for newly diagnosed AML were 67.0% (95% CI, 54.4-76.8) and 77.8% (95% CI, 63.8-86.9), respectively, while the rates for relapsed/refractory AML were 23.9% (95% CI, 12.5-37.3) and 56.9% (95% CI, 39.6-70.9), respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested age and the number of prior failed induction therapy cycles as independent prognostic factors for CRc in relapsed/refractory AML (all P < .05). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 216 patients (90.4%). Thrombocytopenia (64.4%), leukopenia (63.6%), and neutropenia (60.7%) were the most common AEs of grade 3-4. No treatment-related deaths occurred.
conclusionsLipo-MIT-containing regimens were effective and well-tolerated in AML under real-world circumstances. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: ChiCTR2200067172.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.