Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081577›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026

The addition of a lateral extra-articular procedure to a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with an increased rate of further surgery for cyclops lesions and restricted range of motion.

Timothy Voskuijl, Kate E Webster, Timothy S Whitehead, Haydn J Klemm, Lachlan M Batty, Julian A Feller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Timothy VoskuijlOrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.
Kate E WebsterSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5573-3688
Timothy S WhiteheadOrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.
Haydn J KlemmOrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9074-3136
Lachlan M BattyOrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.
Julian A FellerOrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere has been a resurgence in the use of a lateral extra-articular procedure (LEAP) in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to reduce the risk of graft failure. The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of a LEAP in the setting of a primary ACL reconstruction was associated with an increased rate of reoperation for loss of range of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion.

methodsA consecutive cohort of patients aged less than 30 years who received a primary hamstring or quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2021 was retrospectively analysed. The usage of a modified Ellison LEAP in this cohort increased from 0% in 2016 to 51% in 2021. Reoperation rates for loss of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion during the first year after surgery, as well as knee extension deficits at 12 months, were compared between LEAP and no-LEAP patients. Contingency analyses with risk ratio (RR) were calculated.

resultsA total of 1076 patients were included in this study [59.6% male, mean age 21.6 (SD 4.4) years, 84.9% hamstring tendon autografts]. In 17.3% (186/1076) of the patients the ACL reconstruction was augmented with a modified Ellison procedure. Of this group [67.2% male, mean age 18.8 (SD 3.7) years, 79.6% hamstring tendon autografts], 8.1% (confidence interval (CI) 4.2%-12%) required further surgery for restricted motion or a cyclops lesion in the first year after surgery, compared to 3.8% (CI 2.6%-5.1%) in the no-LEAP group (risk ratio (RR) 2.1, p = 0.012). The difference in reoperation rates between those with and those without LEAP was more marked for patients who received a quadriceps tendon autograft (13.2% vs. 3.2%, RR 4.1, p = 0.019), compared to patients treated with a hamstring tendon autograft (6.8% vs. 3.9%, RR 1.8, p = 0.122). There was no significant difference in extension deficit at 12 months between patients with and those without a LEAP (mean 1.02 ± SD 2.6 degrees vs. mean 0.97 ± SD 2.4 degrees, p = 0.85).

conclusionSurgical intervention for a loss of range of motion or symptomatic cyclops lesion in the first postoperative year after primary ACL reconstruction was more common in patients who had an additional LEAP than in those who did not. The higher intervention rate was more apparent in patients who had a quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionReoperationAdolescentAdultAutograftsFemaleHamstring TendonsHumansMaleRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousYoung AdultACL reconstructionanterior cruciate ligamentcyclops lesionhamstring tendon autograftlateral extra‐articular procedurelateral extra‐articular tenodesisquadriceps tendon autograftrange of motion

Identifiers

PMID41081577
PMCPMC13502448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.