Trial reportMicrobiology spectrum2025
Novel model to predict risk of invasive fungal infection and fungal prophylaxis timing.
Trial report in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fosmanogepix: A comprehensive review of its origin, mechanism, antifungal efficacy, and resistance (Review).Biomedical reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients on immunosuppressive drugs or those who are critically ill are at high risk for invasive fungal infections (IFIs). The assessment of IFI risk and the initiation of prophylaxis in these patients remain unclear. A nomogram model was developed to evaluate clinical and immune indicators in relation to IFI risk and validated by immunocompromised patients. High-risk patients, as identified by the model, were selected for a prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of the model and timing of fungal prophylaxis initiation. Patients deemed high risk received either fluconazole or a placebo until IFI occurrence or risk downgrade for 90 days. We compared the incidence of IFI and mortality between the two groups. The nomogram, created from a training cohort ( IMPORTANCE: We still lack enough evidence to decide when and how to begin fungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients. A model based on immune function indicator is an effective tool for predicting risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI) in immunocompromised patients. Patients were collected to evaluate the performance of the model retrospectively and prospectively. CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR2400079810.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.