Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081417›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Intermittent Electrical Stimulation-Induced Contractions Accelerate Pro-Regenerative Processes in Muscles With Deep Tissue Injury in Rats.

Hemalatha Velanki, Neil Tyreman, Peter Seres, Leandro R Solis, Steven Lu, Richard Thompson, Vivian K Mushahwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Intermittent Electrical Stimulation-Induced Contractions Accelerate Pro-Regenerative Processes in Muscles With Deep Tissue Injury in Rats.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hemalatha VelankiNeuroscience & Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Neil TyremanInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Peter SeresPeter S. Allen MR Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Leandro R SolisInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Steven LuInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Richard ThompsonInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Vivian K MushahwarNeuroscience & Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

Canada Research ChairsCIHRFondation Brain Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of an intermittent electrical stimulation (IES) paradigm on the healing of deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI). Electrical stimulation has been extensively studied for the treatment of open wounds, often with amplitudes lower than motor threshold. The effect of electrical stimulation in producing palpable muscle contractions on the treatment of DTPI has not been explored. IES was tested in rats with complete spinal cord injury in which a DTPI was subsequently induced. The goals of the study were to investigate: (i) the natural progression of a DTPI; and (ii) the role of IES in expediting the rate of healing. Three groups of rats were used: (a) a control group in which DTPI is induced, (b) a control group in which stimulation only is applied without the induction of DTPI and (c) an intervention group in which DTPI is induced and IES is applied. Magnetic resonance imaging monitored the extent and progression of injury 1, 3, 5 and 7 days post-induction of injury and/or initiation of IES. Immunohistochemistry assessed the severity of injury and rate of healing by evaluating the presence of inflammatory cells and embryonic myofibres. When applied on day 1 after the induction of DTPI, IES significantly reduced the edema associated with the injury, increased pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophages and increased cell proliferation. It also decreased the overall size of injury. These results suggest that when applied early after the initiation of a DTPI, IES can expedite anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative events and may be an effective means for treating the injury.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPressure UlcerRegenerationSpinal Cord InjuriesWound HealingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectric StimulationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID41081417
PMCPMC12516933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.