ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2025
Molecular Design and Redox Chemistries for Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries (AORFBs).
Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photo-assisted Rechargeable Organic Batteries: Principle, Advancements, and Perspectives.ChemSusChem · 2026Review
- Capacity Degradation Mechanisms, Recovery Strategies, and Challenges of Flow Batteries.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Scalable Synthesis of Sulfonated TEMPO Catholyte for Stable AORFB.ChemSusChem · 2026Article
- Failure mechanisms in redox flow batteries: from apparent capacity decay to active-material loss.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Heterojunction Engineering of Electrodes and Membranes in Redox Flow Batteries.Chemical record (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Molecular Design and Redox Chemistries for Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries (AORFBs).Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aqueous organic redox flow batteries (AORFBs), utilizing redox-active organic materials as energy storage materials, represent a promising frontier for sustainable long-duration energy storage. This review highlights recent advances in redox-active molecule design, analyzing how molecular structures govern electrochemical behavior and degradation pathways critical to stability. We categorize systems by positive and negative electrolyte pairings, examining performance and lifetime challenges across configurations. We explore molecular engineering approaches and full-cell assembly principles to extend battery lifetime. By introducing representative studies within each category of redox couples, we outline state-of-the-art developments and establish rational design and pairing principles. This framework proposes guidelines for selecting compatible electrolyte pairs based on molecular properties of organic redox-active species, which may contribute to advancing stable materials and higher-performance AORFBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.