ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Fast for Real or Just a Feel? Reassessing Hallway Treatment Spaces and Their Impact on Emergency Department Operations.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The practice of placing emergency department (ED) patients in hallway treatment spaces, initially a temporary solution to crowding and anecdotally believed to improve the timeliness of care, has become commonplace, raising the need for empirical evaluation of this practice upon established measures of ED throughput. Methods: We conducted an observational study across 2 EDs between July 2017 and February 2020. We classified all visits as receiving hallway care or roomed care. Outcomes include door-to-bed time, bed-to-provider time, provider-to-disposition decision time, door-to-disposition decision time, and ED length of stay (LOS). We analyzed the throughput for discharged and admitted patients using multivariable regression with an instrumental variable, adjusting for demographics and occupancy. Results: A total of 340,141 ED visits were included, of which 93,289 (27.4%) were initially evaluated and treated in a hallway space. Patients in hallway treatment spaces who were ultimately discharged experienced a 7.57-minute longer overall bed-to-provider time (95% CI, 2.57, 14.14), although they were placed in beds 17.85 minutes faster (20.71, 14.28), with an overall 123.05-minute increase in ED LOS (82.03, 166.81). This relationship between hallway placement and increased LOS was found to be statistically different for certain chief complaints. Admitted patients in hallway treatment spaces also experienced 8.46 minutes faster (5.95, 10.34) door-to-bed time but experienced no significant difference in bed-to-provider, provider-to-disposition decision, and door-to disposition decision times. Conclusion: Although hallway treatment spaces expedite initial placement, the effects in our ED suggest that they may not improve, and possibly even hinder, overall throughput in EDs similar to ours. Contrary to expectations, these findings suggest that expedited care in hallway spaces could paradoxically hinder operational efficiency and timeliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.