ArticleHospital pharmacy2026
Assessment of Meropenem Stability in Meropenem Admixtures Using 2 g Vials and Normal Saline Prepared Using addEASE
Article in Hospital pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic optimization of β-lactams, including meropenem, using extended infusion are recommended by contemporary guidance to overcome elevated MICs and high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability associated with severe illness. Logistical challenges including drug stability must be considered when employing extended infusion meropenem. Although meropenem stability has been determined in a variety of settings to allow for extended infusion, confirmation for use of ready to use dispensing devices would be of interest. The purpose of this study was to assess meropenem concentrations using commercially available 2 g vials when diluted in 100 mL normal saline prepared via addEASE connectors. Methods: Five replicate bags were prepared and sampled at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours. Samples were stored frozen at ~-70ºC until meropenem concentrations determination using validated HPLC-UV and LC-MS/MS methods. Stability was defined as >90% recovery at the individual time point relative to the 0-hour concentration. Results: Starting concentrations were similar across all five replicates with an average (range) of 21.2 (20.2-21.9) and 19.4 mg/mL (17.7-20.5 mg/mL) for HPLC-UV and LC/MS-MS, respectively. No time point resulted in < 90% meropenem recovery from the starting concentration as determined by either assay method. Conclusion: These data demonstrated meropenem concentrations using 2 g vials diluted in 100 mL normal saline when prepared using addEASE connectors remained >90% of the initial concentration over 6 hours at room temperature. This supports extended infusion administration of meropenem per contemporary guidance when prepared using this methodology. Since this method allows storage of doses in automated dispensing cabinets and bedside preparation, this may streamline pharmacy workflows and potentially reduce time to administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.