ArticleCirculation reports2025
Prognostic Utility of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on"Left ventricular systolic recovery after TAVI in severe aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Article
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Cardiogenic Shock.Circulation reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used to assess systolic function and to predict cardiovascular outcomes, but its prognostic role in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. Methods and Results: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from 2001 to 2024 that evaluated the association between preprocedural LVEF and post-TAVI outcomes. Eligible studies were identified via PubMed and Scopus, and included those reporting hazard ratios for preprocedural LVEF. A total of 92 studies comprising 98 patient cohorts and 75,085 individuals were included. Random-effects models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses assessed effect modifiers, including ethnicity, LVEF classification, endpoints, and study design. Each 1% decrease in LVEF was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.03), and this association remained significant after adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of this association in various settings. In the multivariable meta-regression, studies with lower mean LVEF demonstrated a stronger association between reduced LVEF and adverse outcomes, but this association was attenuated or nonsignificant in cohorts with preserved systolic function. This suggests that the prognostic value of LVEF may depend on the baseline level of ventricular function and is subject to effect modification. Conclusions: Reduced preprocedural LVEF is independently associated with worse prognosis after TAVI. These results highlight the continued importance of LVEF in risk stratification and clinical decision-making in TAVI candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.