ArticleCirculation reports2025
Real-World Outcomes of Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation on Anticoagulants Ineligible for Phase III Trials of Direct Oral Anticoagulants - A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Edoxaban for atrial fibrillation in patients with atherosclerotic disease in daily clinical practice.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Trial
- Expanded Application of the DOAC Score for Predicting Bleeding Events in All Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Integrated Analysis of 2 Prospective Japanese Registries-RAFFINE and SAKURA-AF.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Japan: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Circulation reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in real-world practice were ineligible for DOAC phase III trials. We aimed to determine the proportion of Japanese patients with NVAF eligible for these trials and compare the characteristics and outcomes of ineligible and eligible patients to determine the generalizability of the trial results. Methods and Results: This retrospective cohort study included 7,826 Japanese NVAF patients on warfarin from 71 hospitals. We assessed trial eligibility and analyzed outcomes (major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, all-cause mortality) using Cox proportional hazards models. Nearly half (48.2%; n=3,772) of the patients were ineligible for DOAC phase III trials. Ineligible patients were older with more comorbidities and exhibited significantly higher risks of death (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.36-3.43; P<0.0001), stroke/systemic embolism (unadjusted HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.17-1.98; P=0.0016), and major bleeding (unadjusted HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.63-2.44; P<0.0001) compared with eligible patients. Conclusions: Half of the NVAF patients receiving anticoagulant therapy in real-world practice were ineligible for phase III DOAC trials, primarily due to safety concerns. This population differs substantially from eligible patients in characteristics and outcomes. The generalizability of phase III results to real-world patients remains uncertain, warranting additional assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.