Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081234›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

YOLO AI model based on an automated breast volume scanner for the detection of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Qianqing Ma, Junli Wang, Beibei Dong, Jinyan Yang, Wang Zhou, Di Zhang, Dongliang Cheng, Xiachuan Qin, Haoran Zhang, Feng Jiang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Benchmarking YOLOs in breast ultrasound lesion segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qianqing Ma *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5542-1633
Junli Wang *Department of Ultrasound, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu, China.
Beibei Dong *Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Jinyan YangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Wang ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Dongliang ChengHebin Intelligent Robots Co., LTD, Hefei, China.
Xiachuan QinDepartment of Ultrasound, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Haoran ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
Feng JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
Chaoxue ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3037-8819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The automated breast volume scanner (ABVS), a type of ultrasound device, plays a crucial role in breast cancer screening; however, the ABVS data volume places a strain on clinicians. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for the detection and classification of lesions as benign or malignant during ABVS examination. Methods: This retrospective study included 1,284 patients with 1,769 lesions who underwent ABVS examination between January 2017 and August 2021. The lesions were randomly divided into training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. Using the test set, the performance of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) AI model, based on the YOLO version 8 architecture, in single-target (background Results: The recall of the YOLO AI model for single-target detection was 0.983. The precision, recall, mean average precision (mAP) 50, and F1-score of the YOLO AI model for categorized target detection were 0.887, 0.866, 0.919, and 0.876, respectively. While the precision, recall, mAP50, and F1-score of the YOLO AI model for the classification of lesions with diameters ≤10 mm, 10 mm < diameters ≤ 20 mm, 20 mm < diameters ≤ 30 mm, and diameters >30 mm were 0.910, 0.806, 0.868, 0.855; 0.895, 0.844, 0.911, 0.869; 0.876, 0.867, 0.917, 0.871; and 0.882, 0.898, 0.941, 0.890, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the radiologists after they received YOLO AI assistance in the diagnosis of breast lesions were 0.806, 0.890, 0.897, and 0.895, respectively, and these AUC values were better than their AUC values before they received YOLO AI assistance (P<0.001). Conclusions: The YOLO AI model can effectively identify and characterize breast lesions. It improves radiologists' diagnostic performance and bridges expertise gaps between radiologists.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)automatic breast volume scannerbreast cancerdeep learningYou Only Look Once (YOLO)

Identifiers

PMID41081234
PMCPMC12514674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.