ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
YOLO AI model based on an automated breast volume scanner for the detection of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benchmarking YOLOs in breast ultrasound lesion segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The automated breast volume scanner (ABVS), a type of ultrasound device, plays a crucial role in breast cancer screening; however, the ABVS data volume places a strain on clinicians. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for the detection and classification of lesions as benign or malignant during ABVS examination. Methods: This retrospective study included 1,284 patients with 1,769 lesions who underwent ABVS examination between January 2017 and August 2021. The lesions were randomly divided into training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. Using the test set, the performance of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) AI model, based on the YOLO version 8 architecture, in single-target (background Results: The recall of the YOLO AI model for single-target detection was 0.983. The precision, recall, mean average precision (mAP) 50, and F1-score of the YOLO AI model for categorized target detection were 0.887, 0.866, 0.919, and 0.876, respectively. While the precision, recall, mAP50, and F1-score of the YOLO AI model for the classification of lesions with diameters ≤10 mm, 10 mm < diameters ≤ 20 mm, 20 mm < diameters ≤ 30 mm, and diameters >30 mm were 0.910, 0.806, 0.868, 0.855; 0.895, 0.844, 0.911, 0.869; 0.876, 0.867, 0.917, 0.871; and 0.882, 0.898, 0.941, 0.890, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the radiologists after they received YOLO AI assistance in the diagnosis of breast lesions were 0.806, 0.890, 0.897, and 0.895, respectively, and these AUC values were better than their AUC values before they received YOLO AI assistance (P<0.001). Conclusions: The YOLO AI model can effectively identify and characterize breast lesions. It improves radiologists' diagnostic performance and bridges expertise gaps between radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.