Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081219›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

The application of deep learning-based artificial intelligence algorithms combined with low-dose scanning protocols in chest CT.

Xiao-Jing Liu, Xian-Ying Ning, Shen Gui, Tian Liao, Hong-Ying Wu, Jin-Qiang Ma, Zi-Qiao Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiao-Jing Liu *Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xian-Ying Ning *Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shen Gui *Clinical and Technical Support, Philips Healthcare, Wuhan, China.
Tian LiaoDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hong-Ying WuDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jin-Qiang MaDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zi-Qiao LeiDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Under low-dose scanning conditions, different reconstruction algorithms have varying effects on image quality. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the precise imaging (PI) deep-learning artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm combined with a low-dose scanning protocol on image quality and radiation dose in chest computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 100 patients who underwent non-contrast chest CT scans at Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, using Philips Incisive CT between October and December 31, 2024. The patients were divided into two groups: the experimental group (n=50) and the control group (n=50). The experimental group was scanned using a low-dose protocol with a tube voltage of 100 kVp, and the images were reconstructed using the PI deep-learning AI algorithm at a high-intensity level (Group A) and conventional iDose iterative reconstruction (Group B) for both the mediastinal and lung window settings, respectively. The control group (Group C) was scanned using a conventional-dose protocol with a tube voltage of 120 kVp, and the images were reconstructed by iDose iterative reconstruction. Objective image quality metrics, including the mean CT value, standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the regions of interest (ROIs) in the axial images, were measured and calculated. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Additionally, two experienced radiologists independently evaluated the image quality subjectively using a five-point scale (on which 1 represented poor, and 5 represented excellent). Results: The noise level (SD value) of the mediastinal and lung window images in experimental Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (P<0.01). Additionally, the SNR and CNR values of the images were significantly higher in Group A than Group B (P<0.01). No significant differences were observed in the SD, CNR, and SNR values between experimental Group A and control Group C (P>0.05). The subjective image quality scores of Groups A, B, and C were 4.40±0.53, 1.42±0.50, and 4.30±0.51, respectively, with no significant difference between Groups A and C (P>0.05). For the experimental group (Groups A and B) and control Group C, the mean volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) values were 1.37±0.22 and 7.07±1.70 mGy, the mean dose-length product (DLP) values were 56.36±9.82 and 296.8±80.72 mGy·cm, and the mean effective dose (ED) values were 0.79±0.14 and 4.16±1.13 mSv, respectively. Compared to the control group, the CTDIvol, DLP, and ED in the experimental group were reduced by 81.00%. Conclusions: The low-dose scanning protocol combined with high-intensity PI deep learning-based algorithm reconstruction achieves high image quality while maintaining a low radiation dose, making it suitable for widespread application in chest CT screening.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)Chest computed tomography (chest CT)low doseprecise imaging (PI)

Identifiers

PMID41081219
PMCPMC12514655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.