ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Joint model based on intratumoral and peritumoral computed tomography radiomics integrated with clinical features for predicting the spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A radiomics-based machine learning model for the preoperative differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Ensemble machine learning classifiers based on computed tomography radiomics for predicting spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study with transcriptomic interpretation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A fusion model based on tumor and peritumoral CT radiomics for differentiating bronchiolar adenoma from lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The presence of spread through air spaces (STAS)-positive tumors is associated with an elevated risk of local and distant recurrence following sublobar resection, a risk that is not observed in patients undergoing lobectomy. Accurate assessment of STAS necessitates postoperative pathological diagnosis. The objective of this study was to develop a joint machine learning model that combines intratumoral and peritumoral computed tomography (CT) radiomics with clinical features for the preoperative prediction of STAS in lung adenocarcinoma, thereby facilitating optimal selection of surgical strategy and treatment plan to mitigate the likelihood of secondary surgery for patients. Methods: This retrospective study collected data from patients with lung adenocarcinoma from three centers. The dataset from one center was randomly divided into a training group and an internal validation group at a ratio of 7:3, while the datasets from the two other centers were used as the external testing cohort. The random forest machine learning algorithm was employed to construct independent radiomics and clinical feature models. Subsequently, logistic regression was applied to develop a mixed model integrating intratumoral, peritumoral, and clinical features. The performance of the model was evaluated via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis, and the results were visualized through nomogram representation. Additionally, calibration curves and decision curves were employed to assess both the goodness of fit and clinical utility of the model. Results: The results revealed that vacuole sign (P<0.001), crescent sign (P=0.002), gender (P=0.021), air bronchogram (P=0.001), spiculation (P=0.032), and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) (P=0.005) were significantly correlated with STAS status. The joint model integrating intratumoral, peritumoral, and clinical features demonstrated exceptional performance in predicting STAS in lung adenocarcinoma. In the training cohort, the model achieved an AUC of 0.985 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9697-1.000], with a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 93.7%. The internal validation cohort exhibited an AUC of 0.988 (95% CI: 0.9703-1.000), sensitivity of 90.9%, and specificity of 95.7%. In the external test cohort, the model maintained robust predictive performance with an AUC of 0.851 (95% CI: 0.7952-0.9073), a sensitivity of 84.6%, and a specificity of 74.3%. The model outperformed individual clinical and radiomics models, as well as other common machine learning classifiers such as extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) in terms of AUC and overall accuracy. The nomogram visualization of the joint model provides an intuitive tool for clinicians to assess the risk of STAS preoperatively, facilitating the formulation of precise treatment strategies. Conclusions: The joint model developed in this study, integrating intratumoral, peritumoral, and clinical features, serves as a robust tool for predicting the occurrence of STAS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. This model can aid in the formulation of precise and appropriate surgical strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.