Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081203›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Evaluation of a fast-volumetric four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging technique for abdominal radiotherapy tumor motion management.

Peilin Wang, Weiwei Liu, Haonan Xiao, Chenyang Liu, Wen Li, Ge Ren, Yibao Zhang, Hao Wu, Weihu Wang, Jing Cai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peilin Wang *Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Weiwei Liu *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Haonan XiaoDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Chenyang LiuDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Wen LiDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Ge RenDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Yibao ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Hao WuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Weihu WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jing CaiDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Tian LiDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Motion management plays an important role in abdominal cancer radiotherapy. In this study, we investigated the motion measurement accuracy and tumor contrast in liver tumor using a fast volumetric four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI) technique using commercial sequence. Methods: Four volunteers and 34 patients with liver tumors were included in this study with institutional review board (IRB) approval, and all patients underwent routine MRI scans with additional 4D-MRI scan on a 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner. A fast-volumetric sequence [time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (TWIST-VIBE)] was used to acquire 4D-MRI images. The temporal resolution of 4D-MRI was ~0.69 s per measurement. The 4D-MRI sequence was performed before and immediately after the injection of gadolinium contrast agent, termed as non-contrast 4D-MRI (in patient study) and contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI (4D-MRI Results: High temporal resolution (~0.69 s per measurement) and isotropic spatial resolution (~2.7 mm Conclusions: Our preliminary results demonstrated that the commercially available TWIST-VIBE 4D-MRI sequence provides precise volumetric tumor motion tracking suitable for clinical abdominal radiotherapy. Its rapid acquisition and reliable image quality facilitate seamless workflow integration, potentially enhancing treatment precision and improving patient outcomes. The technique offers a practical alternative to existing imaging modalities by combining speed, spatial coverage, and soft tissue contrast without additional hardware requirements. Further efforts will target artifact minimization, optimization of spatial and temporal resolutions, improved clinical decision-making impact, and broader multi-center validation to ensure robust clinical implementation and generalizability across diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI)liver cancerradiotherapy planningtime-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (TWIST-VIBE)tumor motion

Identifiers

PMID41081203
PMCPMC12514584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.