ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Text-guided multimodal deep learning in magnetic resonance imaging for spinal structures segmentation and lumbar abnormalities identification.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the domain of recent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis, the limitations of unimodal deep learning (DL) methods for medical imaging have gradually been revealed in that they remain insufficient to model the latent relationships within the textual semantics of category terms. These terms are used to define the research targets in medical imaging analysis tasks. Effective modeling of these relationships requires textual representations. Therefore, we proposed a text-guided multimodal DL method for segmenting 19 spinal structures and identifying 5 lumbar abnormalities on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) MRI scans. Methods: We employed ConvNeXt V2 as the image encoder (pretrained on 1,975 unlabeled lumbar MRI scans) and the Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP)-based text encoder (pretrained on 515 clinical reports), with the datasets for each modality independently supporting self-supervised pretraining of its respective encoder. We completed segmentation annotations for vertebral and intervertebral disc structures in a partially labeled dataset originally containing only lumbar abnormalities, forming 201 cases of fully annotated T1WI and T2WI MRI samples for model development. We developed a text-guided DL method, which integrated the text encoder and the image encoder, achieving precise segmentation of spinal structures and identification of lumbar abnormalities. Results: The proposed method achieved a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 0.823±0.053 for segmentation of 19 spinal structures. No statistically significant differences were observed between upper-Dice (0.859±0.040) and lower-Dice (0.858±0.038) metrics across all regions of interest (ROIs) (P=0.744, Cohen's d =0.01). Our method outperformed nnU-Net (mIoU: 0.823 Conclusions: This study proposed a text-guided DL method for segmenting spinal structures and identifying lumbar abnormalities in multi-sequence MRI scans. By integrating cross-modal features, our method improved segmentation accuracy and optimized identification performance, demonstrating clinical potential to assist diagnosis through automated workflows that reduce radiologist workload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.