Considerations on the lumbar spine bone mineral density cutpoint values for defining osteofrailia among older Chinese men.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A higher threshold of lumbar spine QCT trabecular BMD of < 95 or < 100 mg/mL for fragility fracture risk screening among Caucasian men than that of < 80 mg/mL for Caucasian women.Skeletal radiology · 2026
   Article
2. Lumbar spine DXA T-score and QCT BMD cutpoint values for defining osteofrailia among older men: a framework for further refinement.Skeletal radiology · 2026
   Review
3. Relevance of vertebral fractural deformity for hip fracture prediction: a community-based study of older Chinese women and men.Skeletal radiology · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.