ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Deep learning reconstruction for accelerating synthetic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a comparative analysis of accelerated and standard protocols.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of MRI-based deep learning models in differentiation of triple negative breast cancer from other breast cancer subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in surgical decision-making across the perioperative continuum: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) offers synchronized acquisition of multiparametric maps and contrast-weighted images, showing promise in breast cancer diagnosis. However, its relatively long scan time limits broader clinical application. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in accelerating SyMRI and to compare its image quality, quantitative accuracy, and diagnostic performance in breast imaging with those of standard SyMRI. Methods: Fifty-eight female patients (mean age 50.38±1.34 years) with suspected breast cancer underwent three SyMRI protocols: standard 2× SyMRI, accelerated 3× SyMRI, and 3× SyMRI with DLR (3× SyMRI-DLR). Quantitative parameters [T1, T2, and proton density (PD)], signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and subjective image quality (e.g., overall image quality, anatomical clarity, diagnostic information, tissue contrast, uniformity, and artifacts) were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance in identifying breast lesions and distinguishing triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from non-TNBC. Results: The 3× SyMRI and 3× SyMRI-DLR protocols reduced the scan time compared to 2× SyMRI. No significant differences were observed in T1, T2, or PD values across the three protocols (all P values >0.05), and there were strong correlations between 3× SyMRI-DLR and 2× SyMRI (r Conclusions: Integrating DLR into accelerated SyMRI for breast imaging yielded a 37.46% reduction in scan time compared to that of the standard SyMRI while maintaining quantitative accuracy and image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.