Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081159›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Machine learning models for predicting transstenotic pressure gradient based on computed tomography angiography features.

Yan Huang, Xu Han, Xiaoyu Qiu, Chihang Dai, Linkun Cai, Zhiyuan An, Hui Zhang, Guo-Peng Wang, Shusheng Gong, Long Jin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yan Huang *Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2298-3971
Xu Han *Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyu QiuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chihang DaiDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Linkun CaiSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Zhiyuan AnSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guo-Peng WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-3131
Shusheng GongDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-3195
Long JinDepartment of Intervention, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xue ZhangTiantan Neuroimaging Center of Excellence, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Binbin SuiTiantan Neuroimaging Center of Excellence, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhenghan YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Pengfei ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9210-6544
Zhenchang WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-6469
Heyu DingDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-6141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The transstenotic pressure gradient (TPG) is closely associated with the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment strategies of conditions such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension and pulsatile tinnitus. Currently, TPG assessment relies on invasive, complex, and costly digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and an efficient, noninvasive evaluation method remains lacking. We thus aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict the transverse sinus TPG using features derived from computed tomography angiography (CTA). Methods: We included 139 patients who underwent DSA for transverse sinus TPG measurement. Six feature indicators were extracted from their CTA data. Using TPG as the dependent variable, we applied six machine learning algorithms-logistic regression, adaptive boosting, k-nearest neighbor, naïve Bayes, light gradient boosting machine, and support vector machine-to construct classification models based on TPG thresholds of 4 and 8 mmHg via fivefold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed through use of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient, and area under the curve (AUC). Shapley additive explanations analysis was used to interpret feature importance. Ultimately, 19 patients were included as an external validation dataset to assess model accuracy. Results: The six selected CTA features were residual area ratio, stenosis length, stenosis type, Labbé vein location, degree of drainage dominance, and contralateral stenosis. Logistic regression demonstrated the best performance at both thresholds, with AUC of 0.83 for 4 mmHg and 0.83 for 8 mmHg. Shapley additive explanations analysis revealed a positive correlation between the location of the Labbé vein and TPG, whereas the residual area ratio and stenosis type were negatively correlated. External validation showed good accuracy, reaching 0.89 for both thresholds. Conclusions: The developed machine learning model shows promising potential for the noninvasive prediction of transverse sinus TPG based on CTA-derived features.

Indexed as

computed tomography angiography (CTA)machine learningmodel predictionTransstenotic pressure gradient (TPG)transverse sinus stenosis (TSS)

Identifiers

PMID41081159
PMCPMC12514606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.