ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Machine learning models for predicting transstenotic pressure gradient based on computed tomography angiography features.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The transstenotic pressure gradient (TPG) is closely associated with the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment strategies of conditions such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension and pulsatile tinnitus. Currently, TPG assessment relies on invasive, complex, and costly digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and an efficient, noninvasive evaluation method remains lacking. We thus aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict the transverse sinus TPG using features derived from computed tomography angiography (CTA). Methods: We included 139 patients who underwent DSA for transverse sinus TPG measurement. Six feature indicators were extracted from their CTA data. Using TPG as the dependent variable, we applied six machine learning algorithms-logistic regression, adaptive boosting, k-nearest neighbor, naïve Bayes, light gradient boosting machine, and support vector machine-to construct classification models based on TPG thresholds of 4 and 8 mmHg via fivefold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed through use of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient, and area under the curve (AUC). Shapley additive explanations analysis was used to interpret feature importance. Ultimately, 19 patients were included as an external validation dataset to assess model accuracy. Results: The six selected CTA features were residual area ratio, stenosis length, stenosis type, Labbé vein location, degree of drainage dominance, and contralateral stenosis. Logistic regression demonstrated the best performance at both thresholds, with AUC of 0.83 for 4 mmHg and 0.83 for 8 mmHg. Shapley additive explanations analysis revealed a positive correlation between the location of the Labbé vein and TPG, whereas the residual area ratio and stenosis type were negatively correlated. External validation showed good accuracy, reaching 0.89 for both thresholds. Conclusions: The developed machine learning model shows promising potential for the noninvasive prediction of transverse sinus TPG based on CTA-derived features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.