Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081157›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Multiscale Fourier transform multiple instance learning for the Gleason grading of prostate cancer from whole-slide images.

Zhiwei Xie, Junying Zeng, Huiming Tian, Zhipeng Mai, Yu Xiao, Yi Zhou, Zhien Zhou, Xudong Jia, Weigang Yan, Chuanbo Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhiwei Xie *4+4 Medical Doctor Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Junying Zeng *School of Electric and Information Engineer, Wuyi University, Jiangmen, China.
Huiming Tian *School of Electric and Information Engineer, Wuyi University, Jiangmen, China.
Zhipeng Mai *Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yu XiaoDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhien ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xudong JiaSchool of Electric and Information Engineer, Wuyi University, Jiangmen, China.
Weigang YanDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chuanbo QinSchool of Electric and Information Engineer, Wuyi University, Jiangmen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies among men, and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment planning and prognostication. The Gleason grading system remains the gold standard for histopathological assessment, guiding both diagnosis and risk stratification. However, manual grading is time-consuming and subject to considerable inter-observer variability, which can lead to the misclassification of tumor aggressiveness. Such discrepancies may result in the overtreatment of indolent disease or the undertreatment of aggressive cancer, directly compromising clinical outcomes. Although computational pathology, particularly deep learning, offers a promising solution, its clinical adoption is often hindered by the need for large, pixel-level annotated datasets. Weakly supervised methods such as multiple instance learning (MIL) can address this issue by training on whole-slide image (WSI) labels. However, existing MIL models often struggle to adequately replicate the pathologist's workflow of examining tissue architecture at low magnification and cellular detail at high magnification. This limitation can lead to an incomplete representation of the complex histological landscape and a failure to capture subtle textural patterns crucial for grading. The objective of this study was, therefore, to develop and validate a novel deep learning framework that overcomes these limitations by integrating multiscale spatial information with frequency-domain features. We aimed to create a robust model for automated Gleason grading that relies only on readily available slide-level labels, thereby enhancing diagnostic consistency and efficiency. Methods: To address the limitations of manual pixel-level annotation in Gleason grading, we propose a multiscale Fourier transformer multiple instance learning (MFMIL) model. This approach extracts pathological features at both cellular and glandular levels from multiscale WSIs. A Fourier transform is employed to enhance feature representation and capture subtle morphological variations. A multiscale cross-attention mechanism is then used to integrate features across two magnification levels, effectively reducing semantic discrepancies between resolutions. Results: The model was validated on two large-scale datasets: 3,775 radical prostatectomy slides from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) and 10,616 biopsy slides from the public Prostate Cancer Grade Assessment (PANDA) dataset. On the PUMCH dataset, MFMIL using only slide-level labels achieved an accuracy of 79.40%, an area under the curve (AUC) of 87.88%, and an average F1-score of 56.54%. On the PANDA dataset, the model achieved an accuracy of 61.97%, an AUC of 85.02%, and an F1-score of 58.46%. Compared to several state-of-the-art baselines (e.g., transformer-based correlated MIL and clustering-constrained attention MIL with multiple branches), MFMIL demonstrated superior performance, particularly in identifying aggressive cases such as grade group 5 (AUC =97.7%). Conclusions: The proposed MFMIL model demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and strong clinical applicability for Gleason grading in both radical prostatectomy and prostate biopsy WSIs, offering a promising tool for enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis in routine pathology workflows.

Indexed as

Fourier transform (FT)Gleason gradingMultiple instance learning (MIL)prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID41081157
PMCPMC12514604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.