Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081152›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Evaluation of the perilesional normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) microenvironment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with quantitative T1rho magnetic resonance imaging.

Lei Wang, Tiffany Y So, Joseph C H Choi, Alexander Y L Lau, Ziqiang Yu, David K W Yeung, Jill Abrigo, Ann D King, Yì Xiáng J Wáng, Qiyong H Ai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lei WangDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5082-5479
Tiffany Y SoDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-0721
Joseph C H ChoiDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-5874
Alexander Y L LauDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-9290
Ziqiang YuDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2466-4942
David K W YeungDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-6761
Jill AbrigoDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-709X
Ann D KingDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5280-8349
Yì Xiáng J WángDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5697-0717
Qiyong H AiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1155-4389
Weitian ChenDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-9285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) primarily evaluates focal lesions, the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) encompasses brain tissue that appears radiologically normal but harbors subtle pathological changes that contribute to the overall disease burden. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of T1rho MRI in characterising distance-dependent microstructural changes in the perilesional NAWM in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: T1rho and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) images were acquired from 30 patients with RRMS and 30 age-matched healthy controls. A total of 217 non-contrast-enhancing MS lesions were identified, and five perilesional layers were delineated from the lesion margins. T1rho values in the intralesional and perilesional regions in MS patients and the corresponding normal white matter of controls were quantified and compared. Results: T1rho values progressively decreased from the lesional regions (111.82±27.58 ms) to the perilesional layer 5 (78.06±4.76 ms) (P value <0.05). Significant correlations were found between T1rho values and mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) in the perilesional areas, with a pattern of progressively lower correlation coefficients (r, 0.23 to 0.73, P value <0.01) between T1rho values and the DTI metrics as the distance from the lesion increased. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that T1rho is a sensitive method for the detection of microstructural changes in the NAWM, and may provide valuable information about the spatial extent and severity of these changes.

Indexed as

diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Multiple sclerosis (MS)normal-appearing white matter (NAWM)T1rho

Identifiers

PMID41081152
PMCPMC12514733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.