Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081144›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Modified hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy protocol for reducing perioperative pain and anesthetic consumption in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hang Li, Yawei Li, Wendi Kang, Junqing Xi, Wei Sun, Yu Liu, Zhengqiang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hang Li *Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3947-1993
Yawei Li *Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wendi KangDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Junqing XiDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wei SunDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhengqiang YangDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with the FOLFOX (folinic acid + fluorouracil + oxaliplatin) regimen has emerged as a crucial treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain significantly reduces patients' quality of life. This study investigated the impact of modified HAIC procedures on perioperative pain levels and analgesic requirements in patients with HCC. Methods: This single-institution retrospective study analyzed 180 patients with HCC undergoing HAIC. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A (n=40), which received the standard FOLFOX-HAIC regimen; Group B (n=74), which received a reverse sequence FOLFOX-HAIC (REFOLFOX-HAIC), with oxaliplatin administered after fluorouracil and leucovorin; and Group C (n=67), which received a direct intraoperative infusion of oxaliplatin with FOLFOX-HAIC (OxDirect-FOLFOX-HAIC). The primary endpoints were the intraoperative and 24-hour postoperative analgesic utilization score and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Secondary outcomes included tumor response and safety. Results: Both modified protocols demonstrated superior pain management. Compared to the standard regimen (Group A), both Group B (REFOLFOX-HAIC) and Group C (OxDirect-FOLFOX-HAIC) showed significantly lower analgesic utilization scores (P=0.021 and P=0.027, respectively). Similarly, VAS pain scores were significantly reduced in Group B and Group C (P=0.019 and P=0.039, respectively). Importantly, these modifications did not compromise therapeutic efficacy; after 3 months, there were no statistically significant differences between Groups A-C in terms of objective response rates (15.00% Conclusions: The REFOLFOX-HAIC and OxDirect-FOLFOX-HAIC procedures significantly reduced perioperative pain and the need for analgesics in patients with HCC as compared to the conventional FOLFOX-HAIC protocol, without compromising short-term tumor control or safety.

Indexed as

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)oxaliplatinpain management

Identifiers

PMID41081144
PMCPMC12514616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.