ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Association of aneurysm sac-specific eccentricity and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk using computed tomography imaging.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Single-center clinical analysis of hybrid aortic arch repair for aortic arch lesions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) often exhibit eccentric expansion, making maximum diameter (Dmax) an insufficient indicator of true aneurysm expansion. This study integrates eccentricity into diameter assessment, focusing on the AAA sac to explore its role in predicting AAA rupture risk. Methods: A retrospective case-control study matched ruptured AAA patients with asymptomatic AAA patients based on age and Dmax. Computed tomography imaging data of infrarenal AAAs were analyzed, focusing on the aneurysm body rather than the traditional infrarenal segment. Eccentricity parameters, including Eccentric Diameter and Arch Curvature Ratio, were assessed. Univariate logistic regression evaluated the relationship between morphological variables and AAA rupture, while the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis compared the performance of different predictive models. Results: Seventy-one ruptured and 71 intact AAA patients were included. Univariate analysis, conducted after diameter matching to exclude the influence of diameter, revealed that the aspect ratio, Eccentric Diameter, and Arch Curvature Ratio of the traditional segment, along with all sac-specific eccentricity parameters, were significantly associated with rupture risk (P<0.05). In subgroups with AAA diameters <55 and <65 mm, sac-specific eccentricity parameters remained significant (P<0.05), whereas traditional segment parameters did not. In model evaluations, sac-specific eccentricity parameters achieved the highest predictive performance. In the overall cohort, the model based on sac-specific Eccentric Diameter and Arch Curvature Ratio yielded an AUC of 0.682 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.77; P<0.001], higher than models using Dmax or full-segment parameters. In the <55 and <65 mm subgroups, the model using sac-specific Eccentric Diameter and Arch Curvature Ratio achieved AUCs of 0.692 (P=0.063) and 0.746 (P=0.002), respectively. When combined with Dmax, the corresponding AUCs increased to 0.762 (P=0.011) and 0.776 (P<0.001), representing the highest predictive performance in each subgroup. Conclusions: Focusing on sac-specific eccentricity parameters significantly improves rupture risk prediction, particularly in small-diameter AAA patients, by better capturing the true expansion rate and more sensitively identifying high-risk aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.