Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081130›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Association of aneurysm sac-specific eccentricity and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk using computed tomography imaging.

Jie Li, Chengxin Weng, Mateng Bai, Tinghui Zheng, Ding Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jie Li *Department of Mechanics & Engineering, College of Architecture & Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chengxin Weng *Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mateng BaiKey Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Tinghui ZhengDepartment of Mechanics & Engineering, College of Architecture & Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ding YuanDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) often exhibit eccentric expansion, making maximum diameter (Dmax) an insufficient indicator of true aneurysm expansion. This study integrates eccentricity into diameter assessment, focusing on the AAA sac to explore its role in predicting AAA rupture risk. Methods: A retrospective case-control study matched ruptured AAA patients with asymptomatic AAA patients based on age and Dmax. Computed tomography imaging data of infrarenal AAAs were analyzed, focusing on the aneurysm body rather than the traditional infrarenal segment. Eccentricity parameters, including Eccentric Diameter and Arch Curvature Ratio, were assessed. Univariate logistic regression evaluated the relationship between morphological variables and AAA rupture, while the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis compared the performance of different predictive models. Results: Seventy-one ruptured and 71 intact AAA patients were included. Univariate analysis, conducted after diameter matching to exclude the influence of diameter, revealed that the aspect ratio, Eccentric Diameter, and Arch Curvature Ratio of the traditional segment, along with all sac-specific eccentricity parameters, were significantly associated with rupture risk (P<0.05). In subgroups with AAA diameters <55 and <65 mm, sac-specific eccentricity parameters remained significant (P<0.05), whereas traditional segment parameters did not. In model evaluations, sac-specific eccentricity parameters achieved the highest predictive performance. In the overall cohort, the model based on sac-specific Eccentric Diameter and Arch Curvature Ratio yielded an AUC of 0.682 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.77; P<0.001], higher than models using Dmax or full-segment parameters. In the <55 and <65 mm subgroups, the model using sac-specific Eccentric Diameter and Arch Curvature Ratio achieved AUCs of 0.692 (P=0.063) and 0.746 (P=0.002), respectively. When combined with Dmax, the corresponding AUCs increased to 0.762 (P=0.011) and 0.776 (P<0.001), representing the highest predictive performance in each subgroup. Conclusions: Focusing on sac-specific eccentricity parameters significantly improves rupture risk prediction, particularly in small-diameter AAA patients, by better capturing the true expansion rate and more sensitively identifying high-risk aneurysms.

Indexed as

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)eccentric expansionmorphological parametersrupture risk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41081130
PMCPMC12514593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.