Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081111›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Knowledge and attitudes of university staff toward organ donation: a cross-sectional study in Oman.

Nasar Alwahaibi, Shahd Al Ghawi, Mohammed Al-Badi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nasar AlwahaibiDepartment of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0000-0002-9421-0951
Shahd Al GhawiDepartment of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Mohammed Al-BadiDepartment of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Organ donation remains low when it is not accompanied by a good knowledge and positive attitude. Most published articles have evaluated organ donation knowledge and attitudes within single categories such as healthcare workers, students, or patients. Few studies have assessed these factors across various job categories. Therefore, this study aimed to fill that gap by evaluating knowledge and attitudes about organ donation among university staff from various job categories. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among university staff between June 2023 and January 2024 using an online validated self-designed questionnaire. University employees were divided into academic, medical, technical and administrative staff. The survey instrument included five distinct sections: study information, informed consent, demographic data, knowledge about organ donation, and attitudes toward organ donation. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression. Results: The study included 385 staff. 64.4% were females, and 52.2% were in the age group between 30-41 years old. The majority of participants demonstrated good knowledge about organ donation (67.5%) and brain death (63.9%), while a significant proportion (67.5%) exhibited a negative attitude toward organ donation. Medical staff have the highest knowledge and attitude with 94.7% and 60.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that medical and academic staff were more likely than administrative staff to have good knowledge (AOR 9.244, 95% CI [2.143-39.871]; AOR 2.300, 95% CI [1.126-4.696], respectively) and a positive attitude (AOR 3.444, 95% CI [1.633-7.262]; AOR 2.636, 95% CI [1.266-5.491], respectively), while females were 2.026 times more likely (95% CI [1.246-3.295]) to have good knowledge compared to males. The most cited organ for organ donation was kidneys (94.5%). The most common reason for supporting donating organs among university students was to save a life (67.3%) and the most common reason for refusing organs was hesitation (45.7%). Conclusions: The study revealed moderate knowledge about organ donation among university staff, with medical and academic staff showing higher levels. However, overall attitudes were less positive, and there was significant reliance on the internet for information. These findings emphasize the need for targeted awareness campaigns and educational programs to improve knowledge and attitudes, promoting a cultural shift towards increased organ donation.

Indexed as

FacultyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmanSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultAttitudeKnowledgeOmanOrgan donationUniversity staff

Identifiers

PMID41081111
PMCPMC12510254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.