Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081082›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2025

Summary of gastroscopy quality indicators applicable in clinical practice.

Mikołaj Machaj, Krzysztof Budzyń, Gustaw Błaszczyński, Tomasz Romańczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mikołaj MachajH-T. Centrum Medyczne, Tychy, Poland.
Krzysztof BudzyńH-T. Centrum Medyczne, Tychy, Poland.
Gustaw BłaszczyńskiStudents' Scientific Society, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Tomasz RomańczykH-T. Centrum Medyczne, Tychy, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in medicine, upper gastrointestinal cancers remain a significant global concern. In Poland, regardless of the increase in performed esophagogastroduodenoscopies, the rate of missed cancers is around 6%. This is related to the insufficient quality measures during the performed examinations. Our paper discusses key endoscopy quality indicators that can enhance the detection of precancerous lesions and cancers. We categorized the indicators into three sections: pre-procedural (fasting time, premedication), intra-procedural (sedation, photodocumentation, virtual chromoendoscopy, quality metrics, biopsy sampling) and post-procedural (coordinated care, training). Some of them, such as chromoendoscopy and premedication in the upper segment, have been widely studied and popularized in recent years. For several years, we have had strict protocols on how to take specimens depending on the condition. Most of the assumptions presented can be easily implemented into daily routine practice, which can improve health care. These are successfully, routinely used in Japan and Korea. We believe that a collective improvement in the quality of esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed will increase the detection rates of precancerous lesions and early cancers. However, further research in this area is still needed.

Indexed as

esophageal canceresophagogastroduodenoscopygastric cancerquality indicators

Identifiers

PMID41081082
PMCPMC12508386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.