ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2025
Efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent
Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Studies have indicated the high effectiveness of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in the treatment of recurrent Aim: The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT in rCDI. Material and methods: In all cases, FMT was performed using a nasoenteric tube. A good response following a single FMT was considered an improvement, whereas requiring more than one FMT was considered a suboptimal response. Results: In the analysed period, FMT was performed on a total of 98 patients, including 74 with rCDI (of whom 23 received 2 FMTs, 6 received 3 FMTs, and 1 received 5 FMTs). The average age of the patients was 68 years. 42 (56%) patients were women, 41 (55.4%) had previously used antibiotics, 2 (2.7%) had used steroids, and 4 (5.4%) had used proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Following the first FMT procedure, clinical improvement was observed in 44 (59.4%) patients. The odds of a suboptimal effect of the therapy (needing more than 1 FMT) were associated with prior use of metronidazole. Among all analysed factors, cardiovascular risk factors (such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia) were associated with a threefold increased likelihood of requiring more than 1 FMT ( Conclusions: In our study, FMT was found to be an effective and safe treatment of recurrent CDI. Use of metronidazole was identified as a risk factor for a suboptimal response to FMT in the studied cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.