ReviewPaediatric & neonatal pain2025
Pain Measurement in Infants and Children With and at Risk for Intellectual Disabilities.
Review in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pain Measurement in Infants and Children With and at Risk for Intellectual Disabilities.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standards of patient care require that comprehensive pain assessments be conducted at routine intervals. Infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, who are at high risk for experiencing pain, receive significantly less representation in the literature to inform pain measurement practice. The objectives of this review include (1) review and discuss the current literature surrounding pain measurement in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, (2) define pain assessment tools, scales, and measures that are being used in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, (3) discuss the strengths and limitations of the pain assessment tools, scales, and measures, (4) make recommendations for future pain research focused on this population. A narrative review of the literature regarding pain measures in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities was conducted using PubMed. A search strategy was created in consultation with a librarian scientist. There were no date limiters applied to the search. Pain measures can be classified as self-report, behavioral (e.g., cry, facial expressions), physiological (e.g., heart rate, biomarkers, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate), and neurophysiological (electroencephalogram, functional magnetic resonance imaging, near infrared spectroscopy). There is a considerable dearth in the literature surrounding pain measures and pain indicators in this population, along with small sample sizes and inconsistent findings reported across studies. Future research is needed to compare pain responses across different age groups and intellectual disability diagnoses to neurotypical peers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.