Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081058›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

The guided understanding of implementation, development & education (GUIDE): a tool for implementation science instruction.

Laura Ellen Ashcraft, Meghan B Lane-Fall

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura Ellen AshcraftDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Meghan B Lane-FallDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of implementation science in health research continues to increase, generating interest amongst those new to the field. However, conventional biomedical and health services research training does not necessarily equip scholars to incorporate theory-driven implementation science into their projects. Those new to IS may therefore struggle to apply abstract concepts from theory to their own work. In our teaching, we addressed this challenge by creating a practical teaching tool based on lessons from implementation mapping and the implementation research logic model (IRLM). The GUIDE: The tool is inspired by implementation mapping, the Implementation Research Logic Model, the ERIC implementation strategies, and Proctor's Outcomes Framework amongst other innumerable lessons from our experience as implementation scientists. We included sections to prompt learners to articulate the evidence-based practice of interest (including core and adaptable components) and the evidence-practice gap. The Guided Understanding of Implementation, Development & Education-GUIDE-and its corresponding prompts may provide a useful teaching tool to guide new users on incorporating implementation science into their evaluations. It also may help instructors illustrate how related implementation science concepts relate to each other over successive lessons or class sessions. Conclusion: This tool was developed from our experiences in teaching implementation science courses and consultation with new users in conjunction with common practices in the field including implementation mapping and the IRLM.

Indexed as

educationimplementation mappingimplementation research logic modelimplementation sciencepedagogy

Identifiers

PMID41081058
PMCPMC12510919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.